![]() My last post talked about the role of division in our lives, how tension and conflict serve to remind us that we are not perfect, not always right, and not God. This is an important scriptural lesson that, unfortunately, churches have almost universally failed to grasp. Churches tend to judge themselves by two metrics: how many people worship on a Sunday morning and how much money they take in. Some churches step beyond that, talking about mission towards their neighbors. Division is viewed as the enemy of all these goals. Division drives people away, along with their donations. Conflict impedes cooperative ministry. Churches have been in the business of quelling division. “Make no waves” has become the mantra of the supposedly-successful church. Is that a proper definition for “success” though? One of the assertions I made in the last post was that without conflict, nothing changes. This is great for the people in power, but what about the people not being served—some of them even being harmed—by the status quo? Setting “no division” as the goal equates to silencing the voices of all the people our ministries miss or damage. It sets up the church as the Voice of God and everyone else as powerless. This is the opposite of scripture. Doing it in God’s name only makes it more ironic. “Make no waves” assumes that the church exists primarily for itself and that it’s already perfect as-is. Neither of these things are true. A church isn’t supposed to prioritize its own existence over and against the lives of its neighbors. Nor can church communities claim perfection any more than the individuals within them can. Doing so is the same as saying they no longer need salvation or transformation through Jesus Christ. Why does the church even meet, then? I, personally, have witnessed a disturbing trend towards dampening down and covering up division in the church over the last decade. Some things are “OK” to talk about: safe things that everyone will agree on, or at least consider not important enough to make a fuss over. Other issues we ignore, because we know in the back of our minds that we risk division if we bring them up. It's time to ask whether the church is fulfilling its mission simply by existing. If we assume our own existence as the center of all things and the gifts we give to the world as by-products, we have already failed. ![]() We stamp out the division because we fear it threatens our continued existence, Doing so, we silence the voice of others, thus becoming less relevant to the world around us and God’s transformative work in it. If we continue down this path, we will dwindle and die, just as we feared we would if we let division happen. Trying to preserve the self doesn’t actually save the self; it leads to the same death, while rendering life meaningless in the meantime. If the church is to matter, let alone endure, it has to give up its obsession with “no waves, no division” and the need for control that comes with it. The church needs to live for something besides itself, bestowing blessings on people outside itself. That means crediting the value of other voices, which means allowing them to have power, which means embracing change and division. The church will not be able to decide whether embracing division instead of running from it leads to life or death. It is not ours to order times and outcomes. We do know that failing to do so will inevitably lead to death, and life without meaning in the meantime. Given the choice, it’s better to die having lived for something beyond the self than die having lived for nothing but a meaningless, powerless version of the self. Death is not inevitable, though! Living beyond the self, there’s still a chance for life in that Other for which you live. It won’t be the same life you’re comfortable with, but it might be an even better one. May the church, and all its people, learn to live in that new life, experiencing and enduring the division necessary to shake us out of the old one that just wasn’t working, even for us. --Pastor Dave
0 Comments
Ep. 34 - Jesus comes not to bring peace to the earth, but set it ablaze. Dave and Justin tackle a tricky lesson from Luke 12. Why do bad divisions happen to otherwise good people?
The Geek and Greek podcast is a show where two reverends talk honestly and clearly about faith, Christianity, scripture, and life. Follow us at GeekAndGreek.com!
Listen to more Geek and Greek podcasts here: geekandgreek.com/
Worship in the Park / Sunday,
September 1 @ Kleiner Park Location: A-1 Covered Picnic Shelter 10:00 a.m. Worship (with Communion) 11:15 a.m. All-Congregation Potluck/Cook-out ![]() A couple weeks ago we read the famous (and famously difficult) passages from Luke 12 wherein Jesus says: 49 “I came to bring fire to the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled! 50 I have a baptism with which to be baptized, and what stress I am under until it is completed! 51 Do you think that I have come to bring peace to the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division! 52 From now on five in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three; 53 they will be divided: father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law.” For most of us, this is hard to understand. We’ve been taught about the Jesus who brings peace, who reconciles, who ends up feeling warm and fuzzy to us. The idea that God’s presence would cause division makes us uneasy. Yet, how else could it be? If the world is imperfect—and I think all of us would admit it is—we cannot rest with a God who says, “Carry on, just as you are. This is fine!” That would enshrine the world’s imperfections as holy. That’s crueler than any argument could be. Where there is damage, where there is danger, God must say, “No.” When God’s, “No” meets the world’s power, division arises. Glossing over the need for division keeps the current power structure and policies in place without anyone questioning them. That’s convenient for the people who benefit from them, less so for people suffering under it. In this way, division becomes a near-automatic byproduct of compassion. When something is wrong, we need to experience enough tension to be aware of it, and hopefully to change it. People outside of the power structure whose voices bring division aren’t threatening us; they’re reminding us who we were supposed to be. We’ve lost track of the necessary role division plays in our lives. We stubbornly insist that where division exists, one side is right and the other is wrong. We want to lionize the side we agree with and vilify the side we disagree with. That’s not consistent with scripture or our theology. We understand from God’s word and our Lutheran confessions that all of us fall short of perfection. Jesus Christ did not come to pat us on the head, nor to be the Holy Bouncer deciding who gets into heaven or not by reputation and works. Christ came as the Savior of those who were lost, mistaken, and could not save themselves. Nobody is completely right. If we claim perfection, we no longer need a Savior; we have become our own god. Even so, we do carry important truths. We can speak of dignity, blessedness, knowledge, love, and a thousand other gifts imparted to us. Each of us has A truth, valid and worth sharing. Nobody can claim to have THE truth, save God alone. When our imperfect, incomplete truths grind against each other, division results. This becomes our safeguard against idolatry, the thorny poke that reminds us that we are not God. The fire of which Jesus speaks is not a new code that we all can agree upon, it’s his death and resurrection which burns the very soil under our feet and upends everything we thought we knew. We cannot greet this transforming fire by claiming we are perfect, or even right. We do not know what direction it will take us, or how it will change the world around us. We greet the Lord and our neighbors with this confession: “We do not know. We are not right. We dare not judge with finality.” ![]() We also greet this kindled fire with hope that, though it, we and the world are being transformed into something better than we were. Farmers burn fields because the harvest is complete and the crops there have done what they were supposed to do. The fire clears the way for new growth, renewal of the land and its purpose. Change is never fun. Tension surrounding change isn’t either. The only way to avoid these things is to spend our lives staring at a field of stubble, idolizing what was instead of growing into what is to be. That’s a poor and hopeless existence, even less fruitful than the conflict. The Gospel calls us to so much more. --Pastor Dave ![]() In my last post, we looked at some of the inadequacies in what we’ve been taught about sermons. Today let’s explore another way to imagine them. God flows into and through our world like an infinite ocean. Scripture is like the pulse of a wave in that ocean. When we read or hear it, we experience God’s motion. The impulse is not just about the water itself; the force of the wave and its effect on the surroundings demonstrate its reality. Those things are an inherent part of the story. A good sermon will do a few things.
The old, not-so-good sermon doesn’t do any of these things. The “just tell me what this means” sermon is like scooping up a pail of the water, carrying down the beach, and asking everybody to come and look at it. There’s a connection still; that is ocean water! But it’s defined, contained, and in possession of the sermon-giver. It doesn’t move, nor does it move anybody else. You’re just supposed to look at the pail of water and nod. If you’re especially good, you might get your own pail and fill it with water to show others. This isn’t faith, but repeating the mistake. We’re not meant to gather inward, around a small pail of water, admiring the person who carried it down the beach to us. We’re meant to move along the beach, looking outward, getting pushed by the wave to new and more amazing things. Being together in faith doesn’t mean standing in a circle, pointing at a pail and saying, “That’s it!” It means admiring all the things God does with all of us and letting our faith life get expanded accordingly, as we move in different ways. The advantage of the not-so-good sermon is that it’s easy to digest and clear. That doesn’t mean it’s right. We must always ask the questions, “For whom is it easy? And for whose sake is this being said?” Usually the answers are, “For the people who already think like the preacher.” One person’s simple answer is another’s bar to understanding. ![]() The “wave” sermon may not give such easy answers. Who knows all the forces the wave brings? Who can tell how it’s going to move us until it hits? The “wave” sermon should leave you walking away with as many questions as answers. Those questions aren’t just about your understanding, but about how God is moving and where the wave is carrying you today. This can be frustrating. The wave DOES build knowledge and understanding, though. Each wave that hits the beach leaves a little bit of water behind. Not the whole amount! The beach isn’t sufficient to contain that. But after the wave recedes, down deep in the sand, the water level is a little higher than it was. Things are moving slightly differently down there than they were. Eventually, wave after wave changes the beach, and thus the people on it. It’s certainly possible to get a revelation that changes your life in obvious ways in an instant. It happens, and it’s valid. When it happens, you also have to ask whether that revelation is all God, or if there isn’t a fair amount of you and what you already wanted in there. We all tend to hear the things we want to hear. Like a tsunami, obvious life-changing revelations might only happen once or twice in a lifetime. They don’t happen every Sunday, with every sermon. Making that a goal warps scripture for both the hearer and the speaker. We get changed more often, and I’d argue more permanently, as we struggle with little revelations day by day, Sunday by Sunday. We don’t experience the true majesty of the ocean through any given wave, but through the awesome accumulation of all the waves together over time, bigger than all of us and never ceasing. Each sermon becomes a small part of that story, continuing the motion until the next wave comes in to move and inspire us again. I’m glad I get to experience this journey with you. I hope you love riding the waves with us.
Ep. 33 - Listen as Dave and Justin deal with their own stress then get lifted up in real time as the words of Luke 12 pour forth between them. Plus... Ear Moths!
The Geek and Greek podcast is a show where two reverends talk honestly and clearly about faith, Christianity, scripture, and life. Follow us at GeekAndGreek.com!
Listen to more Geek and Greek podcasts here: geekandgreek.com/
![]() As part of an upcoming Geek and Greek podcast, Pastor Justin and I talked for a while about the nature of sermons. People tend to think of a sermon as one “expert” giving a lesson to an audience about God or scripture. They think this because the church and its leaders have either actively promoted this idea or allowed it to stand over the years. It’s convenient for the church and especially the Pastor. It gives the central speaker power: not only their own, but the power to speak with the Voice of God (which conveniently always sounds like their own). This idea is also convenient for most church-goers. All the interpretation and struggle have already been done. They get the Word in a bite-sized, easy-to-consume chunk, wrapped up and ready to go like a burger at the drive-thru. Three groups get left of this simple sermon equation. The first is people who are naturally inquisitive, ornery, or just thoughtful. Questions—even honest ones—have often been seen as a sign of personal doubt, an affront to the pastor, or an insult to God. People who ask them have been shunned or abandoned, to the church’s detriment. The second is people undergoing suffering or transition, for whom easy, simple answers don’t work. This marginalized 5% has to nod and pretend that everybody else’s easy lesson applies to them too, which requires burying their pain instead of sharing it. The third is God! Could you reduce your relationship with any person important to you to a simple phrase or lesson? No doubt you could describe *part* of it that way, but saying, “Here is what this person is--in one, easy sentence--and none of you shall think differently!” discredits the person you are talking about. When does that person get to speak for themselves? When do they get to be more than you describe them as? The way we think of sermons is inadequate. Next time, we’ll explore a vision for what sermons could, and maybe should, be. |
Archives
November 2022
Categories
All
|